Writing a scientific article

Writing a scientific article

How to write a scientific article Successful production of a written product for submission to a peer-reviewed scientific journal requires substantial effort. Such an effort can be maximized by following a few simple suggestions when composing/creating the product for submission. By following some suggested guidelines and avoiding c Cited by: 74 Request PDF | On Jan 1, , K.S. Kim and others published The art of writing a scientific article | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGateEstimated Reading Time: 3 mins 6 rows ·  · Yet, often, young doctors do not have much training, if any, in the art of writing a scientific Cited by: 3

How to write a scientific article

In the biosciences, review articles written by researchers are valuable tools for those looking for a synopsis of several research studies in one place without having to spend time finding the research and results themselves. A well-presented review paper provides the reader with unbiased information on studies within the discipline and presents why the results of some research studies are or are not valid. In addition, institutions that fund research tend to use review articles to help them decide whether further research is necessary; however, their value is only as good as the objectives achieved and how the results are communicated.

InQuality of Reporting of Meta-analyses QUOROMwhich focused on meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies, was created during a conference involving a group of scientists, clinicians, and statisticians. The QUOROM statement, checklist, and flow diagram were introduced to researchers to help them better organize their reviews and ensure that specific criteria were followed.

QUOROM was later updated and renamed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses PRISMA with the same values and criteria. A review article is not an original study. It examines previous studies and compiles their data and evidence. Although narrative reviews can be useful, writing a scientific article, they are not in depth and do not necessarily analyze data or study-group sizes for determining whether results are valid.

A meta-analysis is a quantitative systematic review. It combines data from several studies to reach a conclusion that is statistically stronger than any in the single studies, mainly because of having more study subjects and more diversity among subjects. A good review usually concentrates on a theme, such as different theories, information on the progress writing a scientific article developing a new medical device, or how past developments influence new discoveries.

A review might also ask that more resources be used to continue research in that specific field. There are advantages and disadvantages to writing a review. In addition to having more available data, other advantages include confirmatory data analysis and that reviews are considered to be an evidence-based resource. Some of the disadvantages are they are more time consuming and not all studies writing a scientific article provide the requisite amount of data. In addition, statistical functions and interpretations are more complex and authors must ensure that the populations from each writing a scientific article and all studies combined are heterogeneous.

Previous reviews on the chosen theme using Google Scholar can provide information on any new findings, and the following points should be considered when conducting searches:. Once the inclusion and exclusion criteria have been identified based on these points, writing a scientific article, authors are ready to prepare their paper. Sources such as Popular Science and WebMD. com should be avoided, writing a scientific article. These sources, among others, are not allowed to be used as sources for review articles.

Authors must ensure that the sources are legitimate research studies and writing a scientific article they are similar in nature e. Maximum length can vary depending on the author guidelines from the journal to which you are submitting, so authors must always check those guidelines before they begin. As a general rule, most journals ask that a specific font and size be used e. The article structure should contain very specific sections, which might vary slightly according to different science disciplines.

In scientific writing, the IMRAD structure introduction, methods, results, and discussion is a standard format adopted by a majority of academic journals.

Although specific author guidelines might vary, in most cases, the review paper should contain the following sections:. Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:. We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you. Writing review articles. Last updated Mar 25, Leave a comment.

Judy Swan, Scientific Writing: Beyond Tips and Tricks

, time: 1:25:49

Five Steps to Writing a Great Scientific Article | PromoCell

We describe here the basic steps to follow in writing a scientific article. We outline the main sections that an average article should contain; the elements that should appear in these sections, and some pointers for making the overall result attractive and acceptable for blogger.com by: 3 6 rows ·  · Yet, often, young doctors do not have much training, if any, in the art of writing a scientific Cited by: 3 Request PDF | On Jan 1, , K.S. Kim and others published The art of writing a scientific article | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGateEstimated Reading Time: 3 mins